- Axel H. Baum
- 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine
- France
-
- To: Members of the Board of Trustees
December 5, 2002
-
- Dear Member of the Board:
-
-
You are no doubt aware of the outrage which has erupted around the
College’s abrupt decision to eliminate the varsity swimming and diving
programs. I presume you have
received many, many letters of protest.
I hope you have also looked at the special website created to address
this issue, and the compelling letters reproduced on that site.
-
-
The decision to eliminate the swimming and diving teams is a terrible
mistake. The way in which it
was implemented is even worse. The
decision is unfair, and it is wrong from every standpoint; it is harmful to
the students involved, it is harmful to the student body as a whole, and in
the long run it will prove extremely harmful to Dartmouth and its
reputation. You have, I am sure, been bombarded with the reasons and I
will not repeat them here.
-
-
I have talked with all of my many friends who are graduates of
Dartmouth. These include
several of my own law partners (in fact, three plus two who are parents);
with a number of partners in other leading U.S. law firms; and with friends
and clients in the financial sector, in business, and elsewhere.
All of them are appalled by the decision, and by the way it was made.
So this is not the reaction of a small, disgruntled group; it
represents the view of a broad and influential sector of the Dartmouth
Community. These are your
constituency, your support and your “market”; you cannot just ignore
them. Nor can you ignore the
view of the students and of all the other athletic teams which have shown
their unqualified support for the swimmers/divers.
-
-
This decision, if it is left to stand, will send precisely the wrong
message to the students, to future students, and to the world at large.
It will say that Dartmouth does not abide by its commitments; that it
does not care about the interests or the well being of its students; that it
does not care about athletics; that it is willing to abandon principle for
short-term expediency; and that it is unable to manage its financial affairs
in a coherent manner. Dartmouth
will be on its way to becoming a second-class institution.
-
-
I am not a Dartmouth Alumnus. I
went to Amherst and Yale Law School, which I thought – until now –
shared the same ethos and vision as Dartmouth.
But our son chose Dartmouth instead and is a student there now (a
sophomore, with A-level grades, and as you might guess, a member of the
varsity swimming team). I am
deeply concerned for him, and I am also concerned for Dartmouth.
I hope you and your fellow Trustees will give this issue the
attention it merits, and carefully consider, with input from all concerned
parties, what other, less harmful solutions can be found.
-
-
Thank you for your attention.
-
-
Sincerely Yours,
-
-
Axel H. Baum
-
- P.S.
Please take the time to look at the special website www.b-k-ind.com/dartmouth.
-
It makes compelling reading.
-
- Cc:
President Wright
-
Dean Larimore